Convergence of Home-based Enterprises with Domestic Spaces: Evidence from Dhaka Neighborhoods

Sadia Afrin, Sohel Rana, Abubakar Danladi Isah, Reazul Ahsan

Abstract


This research inspects the utilization of domestic space management in marginalized slums of Bangladesh towards comprehending the contribution of urban poor women’s informal employment as a private initiative. The components that influence the physical association of “home-based enterprises” (HBEs) spaces and its quality are assessed concerning the survival pattern of the low-income occupants. Further, the neighborhood and housing attributes, cultural and social, and the financial status of individuals living in slums are analyzed by in-depth interviews with questionnaires. A stratified random sampling method was used to choose 44 households in two notable neighborhoods in Dhaka City. Data was elicited through focus groups of inhabitants using qualitative research method. Thus, structured and open-ended interviews were conducted with household female members who are 18 years and above while participant observation at moderate level ensured the trustworthiness of the data. The differences observed quality and features of spaces in those settlements inhabited by the slum dwellers gave insight on the factors. The study discovered the prospect of women’s domestic spaces of home-based work in their dwelling spaces. Thereafter, the research recommends that future interferences should counter critically to the event of participation and strife contributing towards uplifting women’s situation inside a specific dwelling.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, C. (1964). Man's Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Ahmed, I. (2016). Building Resilience of Urban Slums in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 218, 202-213.

Banks, N. (2008). A tale of two wards: political participation and the urban poor in Dhaka city. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 361-376.

Crossette, B., & Kollodge, R. (2011). State of world population 2011-People and possibilities in a world of 7 billion. New York, 2011: Published by UNFPA.(www. unfpa. org/public/home/news/pid/8769).

Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries: Oxford university press.

Ghafur, S. (2002). Gender implications of space use in home-based work: evidences from slums in Bangladesh. Habitat international, 26(1), 33-50.

Kellett, P., & Tipple, A. G. (2000). The home as workplace: a study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting. Environment and Urbanization, 12(1), 203-214.

Mahmud, S. (2003). Women and the transformation of domestic spaces for income generation in Dhaka bustees. Cities, 20(5), 321-329.

Mohit, M. A. (2012). Bastee settlements of Dhaka City, Bangladesh: a review of policy approaches and challenges ahead. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 611-622.

Moran, D. D., Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J. A., Goldfinger, S. H., & Boutaud, A. (2008). Measuring sustainable development—Nation by nation. Ecological economics, 64(3), 470-474.

Rashid, S. F. (2009). Strategies to reduce exclusion among populations living in urban slum settlements in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 574-586.

Yunus, M. (1999). The Grameen Bank. Scientific American, 281(5), 114-119.

Verrest, H., & Post, J. (2007). Home-based economic activities, livelihoods and space in Paramaribo, Suriname. International Development Planning Review, 29(2), 161-184.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v4.n3.218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode

 

Copyright © 2014 Penerbit UTM Press, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Disclaimer : This website has been updated to the best of our knowledge to be accurate. However, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this web site.

Best viewed: Mozilla Firefox 4.0 & Google Chrome at 1024 × 768 resolution.