The Influence of Environmental Characteristics on the Outdoor Activities of the Elderly: A Case Study at Labor Square, Qingdao City, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v12.n2.1291Keywords:
Outdoor Environment; Elderly; Outdoor Activities; age-friendly.Abstract
The construction of age-friendly cities has emerged as a social development objective in response to the growing senior population. Outdoor activities can enhance the elderly's physical and psychological health, and an attractive outdoor setting can draw them in and encourage them to participate in more frequent and higher-quality outdoor activities. Nevertheless, research on the social and environmental traits of Chinese seniors in outdoor settings still needs to be done. To properly develop outdoor spaces in urban community parks, this study aims to investigate the outdoor activity preferences of senior citizens. Labor Square in Qingdao, China, was chosen as the research site because of its outdoor setting, and data were collected through the "System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities" (SOPARC) to analyse the number and characteristics of age-friendly cities where older people live in different periods and different environmental areas. The findings indicate that older adults in Qingdao Labor Square love playing cards and square dancing. These two activities had the most significant number of participants during the survey. In addition, an excellent biological environment (more shrubs, shade trees, and pergolas with climbers) can encourage senior citizens to use the outdoors during the day, while open spaces are more alluring in the evening. This article investigates the outdoor activities that older people choose, as well as the characteristics of residential outdoor environments which offer a foundation for enhancing both the outdoor environment and senior health. These serve as a resource for designers.
References
Chang, L.-C., Dattilo, J., & Huang, F.-H. (2024). Relationship Between Square Dancing and Meaning in Life Among Older Adults: Examining an Age-Based Moderation Model. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 17(3), 141–147.
https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20240423-03
Chaudhury, H., Campo, M., Michael, Y., & Mahmood, A. (2016). Neighbourhood environment and physical activity in older adults. Social Science & Medicine, 149, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2015.12.011
Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., Bader, M., Morenoff, J. D., & House, J. S. (2008). Mobility disability and the urban built environment. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(5), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn185
Clarke, P., & Nieuwenhuijsen, E. R. (2009). Environments for healthy ageing: A critical review. In Maturitas (Vol. 64, Issue 1, pp. 14–19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.011
Definition of SEMIPUBLIC. (n.d.). Www.merriam-Webster.com. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semipublic
Fei, F., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Fukuda, H., & Yao, W. (2023). Influence of greenery configuration on summer thermal environment of outdoor recreational space in elderly care centers. Building and Environment, 245, 110857. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2023.110857
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press. (Original work published 1971)
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A., & Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2 SUPPL. 2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
Gong, Y., Gallacher, J., Palmer, S., & Fone, D. (2014). Neighbourhood green space, physical function and participation in physical activities among elderly men: the Caerphilly Prospective study. In International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (Vol. 11). http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/11/1/40http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/11/1/40
Grigsby-Toussaint, D. S., Turi, K. N., Krupa, M., Williams, N. J., Pandi-Perumal, S. R., & Jean-Louis, G. (2015). Sleep insufficiency and the natural environment: Results from the US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. Preventive Medicine, 78, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.011.
Hengtao, G. (2024). The significance and strategies of developing sports for the elderly-Guangming Daily-Guangming.com. https://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2014-01/05/nw.D110000gmrb_20140105_4-07.htm.
Huang J, Chen Y, Jones P, Hao T. (2022). Heat stress and outdoor activities in open spaces of public housing estates in Hong Kong: A perspective of the elderly community. Indoor and Built Environment.31(6):1447-1463. doi:10.1177/1420326X20950448
Koohsari, M. J., Mavoa, S., Villanueva, K., Sugiyama, T., Badland, H., Kaczynski, A. T. & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health & place, 33, 75-82.
Lee, A. C. K., & Maheswaran, R. (2011). The health benefits of urban green spaces: A review of the evidence. In Journal of Public Health (Vol. 33, Issue 2, pp. 212–222). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
Marquet, O., Hipp, J. A., Alberico, C., Huang, J. H., Fry, D., Mazak, E., Lovasi, G. S., & Floyd, M. F. (2019). Use of SOPARC to assess physical activity in parks: Do race/ethnicity, contextual conditions, and settings of the target area, affect reliability? BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8107-0.
Li, X., Li, X., Tang, N., Chen, S., Deng, Y., & Gan, D. (2022). Summer Outdoor Thermal Perception for the Elderly in a Comprehensive Park of Changsha, China. Atmosphere, 13(11), 1853–1853. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13111853
Lu, J., & Misni, A. (2023a). Seniors’ Outdoor Survey: Comparing Assessment Results and Interrater Reliability for Outdoor Environmental Spaces. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 11(3), 20–43.
https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.3_20
Lu, J., & Misni, A. (2023b). Determining the Suitability of the Outdoor Environment for the Elderly in Badahu Park, Qingdao, China. Built Environment Journal, 20(2), 61–69.
Lui, C. W., Everingham, J. A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. In Australasian Journal on Ageing (Vol. 28, Issue 3, pp. 116–121). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x
McKenzie, T. L., Cohen, D. A., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., & Golinelli, D. (2016). System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S208–S222. https://doi.org/10.1123/JPAH.3.S1.S208.
Moran, M., Van Cauwenberg, J., Hercky-Linnewiel, R., Cerin, E., Deforche, B., & Plaut, P. (2014). Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: A systematic review of qualitative studies. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-79/TABLES/3.
NBSC. (2021). 2021Communiqué of the Seventh National Population Census.
Parker, C., Barnes, S., Mckee, K., Morgan, K., Torrington, J., & Tregenza, P. (2004). Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people. Ageing and Society, 24(6), 941–962. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X04002387.
Orhan, M. (2022). The Use of Semi-public Spaces as Urban Space and Evaluation in Terms of Urban Space Quality. In: Alberti, F., Amer, M., Mahgoub, Y., Gallo, P., Galderisi, A., Strauss, E. (eds) Urban and Transit Planning. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97046-8_16
Rudnicka, E., Napierała, P., Podfigurna, A., Męczekalski, B., Smolarczyk, R., & Grymowicz, M. (2020). The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas, 139, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018
SDGs Sustainable Development Goals. (2022). http://apps.who.int/bookorders.
Stangierska, D., Fornal-Pieniak, B., Szumigała, P., Widera, K., Żarska, B., & Szumigała, K. (2023). Green Physical Activity Indicator: Health, Physical Activity and Spending Time Outdoors Related to Residents Preference for Greenery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023, Vol. 20, Page 1242, 20(2), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH20021242
Sugiyama, T., & Ward Thompson, C. (2008). Associations between characteristics of neighbourhood open space and older people’s walking. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 7(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2007.12.002.
Umstattd Meyer, M. R., Prochnow, T., Bridges, C. N., Carlton, T., Wilkins, E., Arnold, K. T., McClendon, M. E., McKenzie, T., & Pollack Porter, K. M. (2020). Assessing Physical Activity in Temporary Spaces: Application of SOPARC / iSOPARC® for Play Streets. In Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (Vol. 91, Issue 2, pp. 346–353). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1656793.
Valente, R. (2020). Semi-public urban spaces: evolution and appropriate design process criteria. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, (19), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.13128/techne-7813
Wan Ismail, W. A., Fitry Rosley, M. S., Wan Ibrahim, W. Y., & Abdul Rahman, S. R. (2022). COVID 19: Are Our Green Areas Enough for People’s Well-being. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(2-3), 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n2-3.1031
Wash, P. M., Omar, S. I., Mohamed, B., & Isa, M. I. (2022). Recreation as a Social Factor in Urban Development: A Response to Covid-19 Pandemic in Greater Jos, Nigeria. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(2-3), 91–101.
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n2-3.1042
Wenjie, W., Wang, M., Zhu, N., Zhang, W., & Sun, H. (2019). Residential satisfaction about urban greenness: Heterogeneous effects across social and spatial gradients. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 38, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.011
Xu, L., & Lyu, G. (2022). Influence of Urban Atmospheric Ecological Environment on the Development of Outdoor Sports. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1931075
Yifan, Y. U., Feiyang, Z., Shuying, J., Yuting, G., & Hu, Y. (2020). Research on the Assessment of Age-friendly Community. Shanghai Urban Planning Review. https://doi.org/10.11982/j.supr.20200601
Zhai, Y., & Baran, P. K. (2017). Urban Park pathway design characteristics and senior walking behavior. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2016.10.012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
