The Social Dimensions of Place and Place Quality Indicators in Urban Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v12.n3.1306Keywords:
Land Surface Temperature, Spatio-temporal analysis, Thermal hotspots, Urban Heat Stress, Urbanization.Abstract
The concept of place quality emerged from the social indicators movement, which emphasizes the significance of social issues. Accordingly, place quality encompasses not merely the quality of the physical environment but also the quality of the social environment. However, sets of indicators to measure quality in urban spaces mostly focus on the quality of the physical environment. In this context, the aim of the present study is to create a place quality indicator set, which includes indicators about the relationship of society with the urban space emphasizing the social dimensions of place quality. For this aim, a two-stage process was conducted in the study. In the first stage of the study, a conceptual reading was performed on place to be able to identify the social dimensions of place quality. According to the results of this study, the social dimension of place is associated with the concepts of "experience", "identity" and "belonging". In this context, in order to be able to discuss place quality, it is necessary to talk about the indicators that will promote spatial experience, sustain continuity of identity in space, and ensure spatial belonging. In this scope, in the second stage, in studies which contain quality indicators in the urban space, those regarding the social dimension of place were sought. A systematic literature review was performed in the Web of Science database for the selection of studies to be examined. Sixteen sources with the highest association with the subject were determined among the 209 sources. Content analysis was used in evaluating the sources. As a result of the content analysis conducted by the MAXQDA 2022 software, a total of 30 indicators were created under the themes of "experience", "identity" and "belonging". The value of the study lies in the creation of a set of indicators that assess the quality of place based on the concepts of experience, identity and belonging. Moreover, the indicator set is a valuable contribution to the field as it can be utilized by both research and local government entities and is open to ongoing improvement
References
Andrews, C. J. (2001). Analyzing Quality of Place, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 201-217.
ASBEC. (2015). Creating Places for People: An Urban Design Protocol for Australian Cities. Australia: Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council.
Auge, M. (1995). Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. Verso. (Orig. pub. 1992).
Bentley, I., Alan, A., Paul, M., Sue, M., & Graham, S. (1985). Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Elsevier, Architectural Press.
CABE Space. (2007). SpaceShaper: A User’s Guide. United Kingdom: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place A Short Introduction, Blackwell Publishing.
Cresswell, T. (2008). Place: Encountering Geography as Philosophy. Geography, (93): 132-139.
Casey, E. (1997). The Fate of Place / A Philosophical History. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Casey, E. (2009). Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-world, Second Edition. Indiana University Press. (Orig. pub. 1993).
Çelik, H., Başer Baykal. N., & Kılıç Memur. H., N. (2020). Nitel Veri Analizi Ve Temel İlkeleri. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8 (1): 379-406.
De Certeau, M. (2002). The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press, Berkeley. (Orig. pub. 1980).
Durmaz, S. B. (2015). Analyzing the Quality of Place: Creative Clusters in Soho and Beyoğlu. Journal of Urban Design, 20 (1): 93-124.
El Din, H., S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H., E., & Elariane, S. (2013). Principles of Urban Quality of Life for A Neighborhood. HBRC Journal, (9): 86–92.
Essex Design Guide (2007). The Urban Place Supplement, https://www.placeservices.co.uk/media/56439/Urban-Place-Supplement_2007.pdf .
Gehl, J. (1987). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, Island Press.
Greene, S. (1992). Cityshape: Communicating and Evaluating Community Design. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58 (2): 177-189.
Harvey, D. (1992). The Condition of Postmodernity. Blackwell Publishers. (Orig. pub. 1989)
İnceoğlu M., & Aytuğ, A. (2009). Kentsel Mekânda Kalite Kavramı. Megaron, 4(3): 131-146.
Jacobs, A., & Appleyard, D. (1987). Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(1): 112-120.
Kant, I. (2003). Arı Usun Eleştirisi (A. Yardımlı, Trans.), İdea Yayınevi. (Orig. pub. 1781)
Kaymaz Koca, S., & Jonathan, H. (2017). Üçüncü/Öteki Yer Üzerine Bir Kavramsallaştırma Denemesi: Mekânsal Bir Trilojinin İçinde Saklı Hikayelerin Keşfedilmesi. Megaron, 12 (3): 488-496.
Khalili, A., & Fallah, S. N. (2018). Role of Social Indicators on Vitality Parameter to Enhance the Quality of Women's Communal Life Within an Urban Public Space (Case: Isfahan's Traditional Bazaar, Iran). Frontiers of Architectural Research, (7): 440–454.
Kuru, A., & Özkök, M. K. (2017). Yaşanabilirlik Kavramı Bağlamında Kamusal Açık Mekânların Değerlendirilmesi: Kırklareli Kent Merkezi Örneği. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 28 (28): 43-60.
Lynch, K. (1981). A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press.
Marans, R. (2003). Understanding Environmental Quality Through Quality-Of-Life Studies: The 2001 DAS And Its Use of Subjective and Objective Indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1-2): 73-83.
Marcus, C., & Francis, C. A. (1990). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, Van Nostrand Reinhold, USA.
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1): 53–88.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception, Humanities Press, New York. (Orig. pub. 1962)
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (2016). Genişletilmiş bir kaynak kitap: Nitel veri analizi (Akbaba Altun, Sadegül and Ali Ersoy, Trans.), Pegem Akademi.
Nasar, J. (1998). The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PPS (Project for Public Spaces). (2022). What Makes a Successful Place? https://www.pps.org/article/grplacefeat (accessed May 1, 2023)
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards A Man-Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness, London: Pion.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, London: Academy Editions.
Seamon, D. (1979). A Geography of the Lifeworld: Movement, Rest, and Encounter, Croom Helm, London.
Sepe, M. (2010). “Liveability, Quality and Place Identity İn The Contemporary City: How to Monitor and Mitigate the Impact of Globalization on Urban Spaces.” Journal of Place Management and Development, 3 (3), 221-246.
Smith, D. (1973). The Geography of Well Being in the United States, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other Real-and-Imagined Places, Malden, Blackwell Pub.
Tuan Y. F. (1990). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. Columbia University Press. (Orig. pub. 1974)
Tuan Y. F. (2001). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Orig. pub. 1977)
Tuncer Gürkaş, E., & Barkul, Ö. (2012). Yer Üzerine Kavramsal Bir Okuma Denemesi. Sigma, (4): 1-11.
Uzgören, G, & Erdönmez, E. (2017). Kamusal Açık Alanlarda Mekân Kalitesi ve Kentsel Mekân Aktiviteleri İlişkisi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme. Megaron, 12 (1), 41-56.
Veenhoven, R. (2000). The Four Qualities of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1 (1), 1-39.
Yeang, L. D. (2006) Quality of Place: The North’s Residential Offer, London: Leeds City Region.
Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., Bosman, C., & Coiacetto, E. (2019). “Measuring Experiential Qualities of Urban Public Spaces: Users’ Perspective.” Journal of Urban Design, 24 (3): 340-364.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
