Political Representation In Urban Public Space In Jakarta Child-Friendly Public Space (Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak – RPTRA)

Authors

  • Eka Permanasari Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Jalan Cendrawasih Raya B7/P Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia 15413
  • Sahid Mochtar Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Jalan Cendrawasih Raya B7/P Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia 15413
  • Rahma Purisari Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Jalan Cendrawasih Raya B7/P Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia 15413

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v6.n2.351

Keywords:

Everyday uses, political representation, public space.

Abstract

The design of public space often embodies the power and political representation of a specific regime. As urban architecture symbolizes and establishes the identity of a regime, authorities often use a top-down approach to implement urban architectural programs. As a result, the spaces constructed often display power and identity, but lack consideration of public use. Public spaces are often exclusionary for public use. They merely stand for the representation of the authority. Accordingly, many public spaces built by the government are abandoned soon after their launch. Big ceremonies and public space displays only last a few days before these spaces are then closed to the public or appropriated for different uses. Most top-down approaches focus on the physical development, overlooking the users’ inclusion in decision making. This research analyses the political representation of public space design in RPTRA Bahari located in the South Jakarta. It analyses the political reason behind the development of RPTRA in Jakarta and the way participative design approach is employed during the design process to get public engagement in public space. Therefore, it investigates how the political representation is perceived in everyday life by analysing how the public space has been used three years since its launch. Through observation and interviews, this paper interrogates the political representation in urban forms and how public spaces become an arena where the government’s intentions and everyday uses meet. It concludes that a participative, bottom-up approach leads to more public use and engagement.

Author Biography

Eka Permanasari, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Technology and Design, Universitas Pembangunan Jaya, Jalan Cendrawasih Raya B7/P Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia 15413

Eka Permanasari, PhD currently works as the Vice Dean in Academic at Universitas Pembangunan Jaya. She has been practicing as an Urban Designer and working as a Lecturer both in Indonesia and Australia. She has published several articles in the field of architecture and urban design and selected writing in regards to the postcolonial architecture and urban development in Indonesia was included in the book of Becoming Places: Urbanism / Architecture /Identity /Power, Routledge, 2009.


Dr. Permanasari joined Universitas Pembangunan Jaya in 2010 and has been appointed as the team leader for several Jakarta Provincial Government projects, such as Giant Sea Wall, Ali Sadikin International Airport, and LRT Jakarta. Together with the former Jakarta Governor, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, She has initiated and made the concept of RPTRA (Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak –Jakarta Community Center) which are applied to the 6 pilot projects located on every Jakarta Municipality. The concept and design guidelines were furtherly implied in the development of the next 284 RPTRAs spread across Jakarta.

References

Alsayyad, N. (1992). Forms of Dominance: On the Architecture and Urbanism of the Colonial Enterprise. Avebury: Aldershot.

Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal Of The American Planning Association. 35(4): 216-224.

Carina, J., 2017. DKI Akui RPTRA Hasil CSR Lebih Flexible Dalam Perubahan Desain. Kompas, 28 July.

Carr, S., Francis, M., L.G, R., & Stone, A. (1992). Public Space. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dede, O. M., 2012. A New Approach For Participative Urban Design: An Urban Design Study Of Cumhuriyet Urban Square in Yozgat Turkey. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning .5: 122-131.

Desrianto, M., 2018. Bangun 7 Taman Maju Bersama, Pemrov DKI Ingin Perkuat Interaksi Warga. megapolitan.kompas.com, 11 December.

Dovey, K., 2010. Becoming Places. New York: london.

Elyda, C., & Budiari, I. (2015, September 17). Jakartans Enthused with New RPTRA Community Centers. The Jakarta Post.

Gehl, J. (1987). Life Between Building (Using Public Space). London: Island Press.

Hernowo, E. &. N. A., 2017. Karakteristik Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA) Bahari di Kecamatan Cilandak Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Teknik. 6(2): 2337-3520.

H. S. Aji, R. B. (2016). The Development Of Child-Friendly Integrated Public Space In Settlement Areas As An Infrastructure of Jakarta. In C. Brebbia, WIT Transaction on Ecology and the Environment (p. 13). USA: WIT Press.

Iveson, K. (2007). Publics and the City. Wiley: Kindle Edition.

Kahraman, M., Pak, B., & Scheerlinck, K. (March 2018). Production of Heterotopias as Public Spaces and Paradox of Political Representation: A Lefebvrian Approach. ITU AZ Journal, 135-145.

http://www.azitujournal.com/jvi.aspx?pdir=itujfa&plng=eng&un=ITUJFA-58569

Kusno, A., 2000. Behind the Postcolonial: Architecture, Urban Space and Political Cultures in Indonesia. 1st edition ed. London: Routledge.

Laksana, B. A., 2017. M. Taufik Minta Pembangunan RPTRA yang Pakai Dana CSR diaudit. Detiknews.com, 29 Mei.

Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writing on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.

Mamduh, N., 2018. Pemprov DKI akan Hapus Anggaran Pembangunan RPTRA di 2019. Tirto.id, 5 March.

Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York and London: Guilford Press.

Pak, B. (2017). Strategies and Tools in Bottom-up Practices in Architecture and Urban Design Studios. Knowledge Cultures. 12.

Permanasari, E., 2010. Constructing and Deconstructing the Nation: Sukarno’s Monuments and Public Places in Jakarta. Germany: LAP Lambert Publishing.

Permanasari, E., in Dovey, K. (2010). New order: Monas and Merdeka Square. In: K. Dovey, ed. Becoming Places”: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power. London: Routledge.

Permanasari, E., Nurhidayah, F. & Nugraha, H., 2018. Metode Desain Partisipatif Sebagai Model Pembangunan 6 RPTRA DKI Jakarta. Jakarta: Universitas Pembangunan Jaya.

Sanders, Elizabeth B-N; SonicRim. (2002). From User-Centered to Partisipatory Design Approach. In J. Frascara, Design and Social Sciences: Making Connections. London And New York: taylor and Francis.

Tonnelat, S., 2010. The Sociology of urban Public Spaces. In: Territorial Evolution and Planning Solution: Experience from China and France. Paris: Atlantis Press. 1-10.

Vale, L., 1992. Architecture, Power and National Identity. London: Yale University Press.

Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by Design. California: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

How to Cite

Permanasari, E., Mochtar, S., & Purisari, R. (2019). Political Representation In Urban Public Space In Jakarta Child-Friendly Public Space (Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak – RPTRA). International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 6(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v6.n2.351