BRANDING LANGKAWI ISLAND AS A GEOPARK DESTINATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v6.n1-2.377Keywords:
Geopark, destination brand, Langkawi, sustainable development, MalaysiaAbstract
The objective of this study is to examine the issues and challenges of making a geopark status as a destination brand to promote sustainable tourism. It briefly describes the process of obtaining geopark status based on the experience with Langkawi Island, Malaysia which was designated in 2007. 35 individuals were interviewed representing various important stakeholders such as different level of managers of a development authority, National Tourism Organization, tourism operators and local community concerning their expectations, government initiatives, and acceptance towards promoting Langkawi Geopark as a brand. The findings indicate that most of the stakeholders support and accept the Langkawi Geopark as a global brand that recognised by UNESCO. However, most of them are still confused about the Geopark concept in terms of its implementations and the actions needed to protect the brand. More concerted efforts are needed to create the Geopark brand awareness especially among local community and business operators. It is necessary to educate these stakeholders about the benefits of having the geopark status in order to use the brand to promote sustainable tourism development on the island.References
Abdul Ghani, K. (2014). The Making of Langkawi Geopark- An Experiential Journey. In LESTARI public lecture No. 13. Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI) UKM.
Azman, N., Halim, S. A., Liu, O. P., & Komoo, I. (2011). The Langkawi Global Geopark: Local Community’s Perspectives on Public Education. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 17(3): 261–279.
Blain, C., Levy, & Ritchie, J. R. B. (2005). Destination Branding: Insights and Practices from Destination Management Organizations. Journal of Travel Research. 43: 328–338.
Bregoli, I. (2012). Effects of DMO Coordination on Destination Brand Identity: A Mixed-Method Study on the City of Edinburgh. Journal of Travel Research. 52(2): 212–224.
Choo, H., Park, S.-Y., & Petrick, J. F. (2011). The Influence of the Resident’s Identification with a Tourism Destination Brand on Their Behavior. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 20(2): 198–216.
Costa, C. M. M., & Amrikazemi, A. (2014). Geo-knowledge Management and Geoconservation via Geoparks and Geotourism. Geoheritage. 6: 185–192.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dowling, R. K. (2013). Global Geotourism – An Emerging Form of Sustainable Tourism. Czech Journal of Tourism. 2(2): 59–79.
Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C., & Costa, C. (2011). Geotourism and Geoparks as Novel Strategies for Socio-economic Development in Rural Areas 1. International Journal of Tourism Research. 81(August 2010): 68–81.
Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C., & Costa, C. (2012). Geotourism and Geoparks as Gateways to Socio-cultural Sustainability in Qeshm Rural Geotourism and Geoparks as Gateways to Socio- cultural Sustainability in Qeshm Rural Areas, Iran. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. 17(1): 37–41.
García, J. A., Gómez, M., & Molina, A. (2012). A Destination-Branding Model: An empirical analysis based on stakeholders. Tourism Management. 33: 646–661.
Halim, S. A., Komoo, I., & Omar, M. (2011). The Geopark as a Potential Tool for Alleviating Community Marginality: A Case Study of Langkawi Geopark, Malaysia. The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures. 5(1): 94–113.
Hashim, H. S., Aziz, S., & Aziz, R. A. (2011). Conservation with Development: Showcasing Langkawi Geopark. Planning Malaysia. 9: 1–24.
Hose, T. A. (2007). Geotourism in Almeria Province, Southeast Spain. Tourism. 55(3): 259–276.
Kavaratzis, M. (2012). From “Necessary Evil” to Necessity: Stakeholders’ Involvement in Place Branding. Journal of Place Management and Development. 5(1): 7–19.
Kavaratzis, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2013). The Dynamics of Place Brands: An Identity-Based Approach to Place Branding Theory. Marketing Theory. 13(1): 69–86.
Kemp, E., Williams, K. H., & Bordelon, B. M. (2012). The Impact of Marketing on Internal Stakeholders in Destination Branding: The Case of a Musical City. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 18(2): 121–133.
Morgan, N. J., Pritchard, A., & Piggott, R. (2003). Destination Branding and the Role of the Stakeholders: The Case of New Zealand. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 9(3): 285–299.
Otjen, A. (2013). Positioning and Branding a Wilderness Tourist Attraction to Meet all Stakeholders Objectives. Tourismos. 8(3): 129–150.
Ryan, J., & Silvanto, S. (2009). The World Heritage List: The making and management of a brand. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy.5(4): 290–300.
Ryan, J., & Silvanto, S. (2009). The World Heritage List: The making and management of a brand. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy.5(4): 290–300.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).