AN OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY OF PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT IN KADUNA METROPOLIS, NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v6.n1-2.385Keywords:
Property Valuation, Valuation Report, Clients, Estate Surveyors and ValuersAbstract
The study examines the quality of valuation reports in Kaduna metropolis with a view to examining their satisfaction level and thus improving on the quality of the valuers’ reports. The survey method employs the use of self-administered questionnaire coupled with interview to obtain the relevant data. A total of 15 Banks and 20 estate surveying and valuation firms were studied. Data collected were analyzed using tables and relative importance index. The result of the examination of 18 valuers’ reports in comparison with the standard expected shows that valuers’ reports were meeting the standard. The result also showed 53.3% of the banks are at least satisfied with overall contents of their valuation reports. However, the examination of clients’ needs revealed that they would prefer to see more details on the reports. The result shows that “clients demand more information on the larger property market and valuation calculation to convince them on how the valuers arrived at the value; a portion stating the complexity of the market and the position of the property in the market; more emphases on the analytical aspects of the valuation and the estate surveyors and valuers should state how certain they are about the valuation figures”. The study concluded that there should be greater understanding between the clients and estate surveyors with respect to the needs of the clients in the area of valuation reports as well as greater understanding of the limitation of the value figure.References
Adair, A. & Hutchison, N. (2015). The Reporting of Risk in Real Estate Appraisal Property Risk Scoring. Journal of Property investment and Finance. 23(3): 254-268.
Aluko, B. T. (2007). Implications of the Current Trends in Mortgage Valuation Practice in Nigeria. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 11: 1731.
Australian Property Institute (2004). Professional Practice 2004.Australian Property Institute: Canberra.
Crosby, N. (2000). Valuation Accuracy, Variation and Bias in the Context of Standards and Expectations. Journal of Property Investment and Finance. 18(2): 130-161.
Ifediora, G. S. A. Appraisal Framework. Enugu: Iwuba Ifediora and Associates.
IVSC (2011). International Valuation Standards 2011. London: International Valuation Standards Council (1993).
Kuye, O. (2000). Property Valuation: Principles & Practice in Nigeria. Lagos: Olusegun Kuye and Associates.
Mallinson Report. Commercial Property Valuation. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors; London (1994).
Martin, D., Najib, M., Nowell, G. & Eni, S. (2011) Quality of Valuation Report in Malaysia, NAPREC, Valuation and Property Service Department, Ministry of Finance, Malaysia
Newell, G. Client Perception of the Quality of Valuation Reports in Australia. Australian Property Journal. (2005)
Newell, G. & Barrett, V. (1990). The Quality of Valuation Reports. The Valuer. 31(2): 9698.
Newell, G. (1999). The Quality of Valuation of Valuation Reports of Australia. Sydney: The Appraisal Journal.
Newell, G. (1995). The Quality of Valuation Reports. The Valuer and Land Economist.
Newell, G. & Fibbens, M. (1991). Professional Valuation Practice Standards in NSW. The Valuer. 31(4): 382-385.
NIESV (2006). Valuation Standards and Guidance Notes of the Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers. Lagos: NIESV.
Ogunba, O. A. & Ajayi, C.A. (1998). An Assessment of the Accuracy of Valuations in the Residential Property Market of Lagos. The Estate Surveyor and Valuer. Journal of Nigerian Institution of Estate and Surveyors and Valuers. 21(2): 1923.
Oluwunmi, A. O., Ajayi, C.A., Olaleye, A. & Fagbenie, O.I. (2011). An Analysis of Client’s Satisfaction with Mortgage Valuation Reporting in Nigeria. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 3(2): 1-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).