A Heritage Tourism and Tourist Flow Pattern: A Perspective on Traditional versus Modern Technologies in Tracking the Tourists

Authors

  • Mohamad Akmal Mohamad Toha Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Hairul Nizam Ismail Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v2.n2.61

Abstract

Historic city offers tourists a mixture of cultural heritage and leisure activities in a unique set-ting. However, there are limited research addressing the movement and behavior of tourists in tourism destination that leads the understanding of urban function towards "heterogeneity" and "multi functionality". In order to maintain and ensuring long-term success as an attractive des-tination for tourists, tourist’s movement and behavior is most likely an important element to be fully understood by decision maker. Hence, the method of tracking tourist is one of the im-portant aspects in providing better picture, especially in the context of obtaining accurate data on the tourist’s movement. Hence, the studies were designed to determine the potential worth of the various tracking technologies for research on tourist movement in Melaka historic cities. The discussion in this paper focusing on 6 traditional and 5 modern methods of tracking tourists movement. Accuracy, availability, location of the study area, costs, privacy of travelling, dura-tion of tracking and suitability in tracking daily movement are used as variables to identify which tracking method is the best to track tourists in heritage site. Existing literature indicates that application of GPS in a smart phone emerges as the best option method for tracking tour-ists in Melaka heritage site. By comparing methods of tracking tourists, it may assist researcher to choose the best option of method to obtain accurate and precise data about tourist move-ment. Thus, the study offered a systematic review of several tracking technologies in which potentially able to push the boundaries of tourism studies, as well as improving policy making, planning and management in tourism area.

References

Anderson, J. (1971). Space-time budget and activity studies in urban geography and planning. Environment and Planning, 3(4): 353-68.

Dievsort, A.G.J. (1994). Cultural Tourism and Time Space Behavior in G. Ashworth and P. Larkham (eds) Building a New Heritage: Tourism, Culture and identity in the New Europe, London; Routledge, 69-89

Gladstone, D.L. & Fainstein, S.S. (2001). Tourism in US global cities : A comparison of New York and Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 (1), 23-40

Edwards, D & Griffin, T (2013). Understanding Tourists' Spatial Behavior: GPS tracking as an aid to sustainable Destination Management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(4):580-595

Hartmann, R. (1988). Combining Field Methods in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 12:88-105

Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant Observation as a Data Collection Method [81 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozial forschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 43

Keul, A. & Kuheberger, A. (1997). Tracking The Salzburg Tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4): 1008-12

Lau, G. and McKercher, B. (2008). Movement Pattern of Tourists within a Destination. Tourism Geography, 10(3)

Lue, C.C., Crompton, J.L. & Fessenmaier, D.R.(1993). Conceptualization of multi destination pleasure trips. Annals of Tourism Research, 20: 289-301

Ming, R.C. & Mc Hugh, K.E. (1992). The Spatial configuration of travel to Yellowstone National Park. Journal of travel research, 30 (Spring):38-46.

Murphy, P.E. (1992). Urban Tourism and visitor Behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 36: 200-11

Opperman, M. (1995). A Model of Travel Itineraries. Journal of Travel Research. pp. 741-750

Pearce, D. G. (1988). Tourist Time-Budget. Annals of Tourism Research, 15: 106-21

Schiling, A., Coors, V., & Laakso, K. (2005). Dynamic 3D map for mobile tourism application in L. Meng, A. Zipf and T. Reinchenbacher (eds) Map Based Mobile Services : Theories, Methods and Implementation, New York: Springer Geosciences, 233-44

Schensul, J.J., Stephen L. & LeCompte, M.D. (1999). Essential ethnographic methods: observations, interviews, and questionnaires (Book 2 in Ethnographer's Toolkit). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

Schmuck, Richard (1997). Practical action research for change. Arlington Heights, IL: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing

Shoval, N. & Isaacson, M. (2010). Tourist mobility and Advanced Tracking Technologies. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Szalai, A. (1972). The Use of Time: Daily activities of Urban and Suburban Population in Twelve Countries, The Hague and Paris: Mouton

Thornton, P.R., Williams, A.M., & Shaw, G. (1997). Revisiting time-space diaries: An explanatory case study of tourist behavior in Cornwall, England. Environment and Planning A, 29 (10): 1847-67

Yan, W. & Forsyth, D. (2005). Learning the behavior of users in a Public Space Through video Tracking. Breckenridge, Colorado.

Zhao, Y. (1997). Vehicle Location and Navigation System. Norwood MA; Artech House.

Zillinger, M. (2007). Tourist routes; A Time Geographical approach on German car-tourists in Sweden. Tourism Geographies, 9(1): 64-83

Downloads

Published

2015-05-05

How to Cite

Mohamad Toha, M. A., & Ismail, H. N. (2015). A Heritage Tourism and Tourist Flow Pattern: A Perspective on Traditional versus Modern Technologies in Tracking the Tourists. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v2.n2.61