Relationship between Window and View Factors in the Workplace: A SEM Approach
Keywords:Window, View, Workplace, Occupants, Structural Equation Model
Office occupants’ have always preferred workplaces that have windows that connects them to the outside. Window access to the outside can influence occupants’ satisfaction with the combination of other workplace features. This study aims to identify the window and view factors relationship in the workplace, to confirm the reliability and validity of the measurement and structural model. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, primary data from five offices in the Kogi State of Nigeria with 267 respondents were collected by using the convenience sampling method and analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for Social Science version 23 and AMOS 22.0 version as the modelling tool. The study identified eleven vital factors that are interrelated in the relationship between windows and view in the workplace. They are referred to as latent construct namely; Window distance (WDB), Seating arrangement (SAB), Room height (FHB), Office size (OSB), Window position (WPB), Window Sill level (WLC), Window size (SWC), Window type (TWC), View content (CVC), View satisfaction (VSC), and Occupants’ satisfaction (SAT). The result showed a valid model using the Structural Equation Model, and the effect of the current workplace negligence on occupants’. This study improves the existing knowledge on the window and view relationship in the workplace, and provide suggestions for Facility Managers, Architects, and Interior Designers on maintaining a healthy workplace environment
Adedayo, F. O., Oyetola, S. A., Anunobi, A. I., & Odine, L. C. (2015). User Satisfaction with Space Flexibility in Selected Tertiary Institutions in Niger State, Nigeria. In 6th West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference (pp. 1185–1200).
Al horr, Y, Arif, M, Kaushik, AK, Mazroei, A, Katafygiotou, M and Elsarrag, E. (2016). Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality : a review of the literature Review of the Literature. Building and Environment, 105, 45. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001
Aries, M. B. C. C., Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.004
Awang, Z. (2015). Chapter 6 : Data Analysis : Model Fit Analysis and Hypotheses Testing, 0(Byrne), 125–143.
Awang, Zainudin. (2015). A Handbook on SEM Zainudin Awang-Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Analyzing the SEM Structural Model. In A Handbook on SEM (pp. 71–86).
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394
Boubekri, M., & Haghighat, F. (1993). Windows and Environmental Satisfaction: A Survey Study of an Office Building. Indoor and Built Environment, 2(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X9300200305
Boubekri, M., Hulliv, R. B., & Boyer, L. L. (1991). Impact of window size and sunlight penetration on office workers’ mood and satisfaction.
Butler, D. l., & Biner, P. m. (1989). Effects of settings on window preferences and factors associated with those preferences.pdf.
Butler, D. L., & Steuerwald, B. L. (1991). Effects of view and room size on window size preferences made in models. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591233005
Chong, E. E., Nazim, A., & Ahmad, S. B. (2014). A comparison between Individual confirmatory factor analysis and pooled confirmatory factor analysis: An analysis of library service quality, a case study at a public university in Terengganu. Interational Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 3(1), 110–116.
Collins, B. L. (1976). Review of the psychological reaction to windows. Lighting Research & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535760080020601
Cuce, E., Young, C. H., & Riffat, S. B. (2015). Thermal performance investigation of heat insulation solar glass: A comparative experimental study. Energy and Buildings, 86, 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.063
Danielsson, B. C., & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 636–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307459
Dogrusoy, I. T., & Tureyen, M. (2007). A field study on determination of preferences for windows in office environments. Building and Environment, 42(10), 3660–3668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.09.010
Frontczak, M., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 46(4), 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Barry J. Babin, & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: A Practical Approach. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8
Hartig, T., Mang, M. &, & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3–26.
Hartig, Terry, Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1986). Adaptations to windowlessness, a study of the use of visual decor.pdf. Environment and Behavior, 18(5), 623–639.
Hellinga, H. (2013). Daylight and View, The influence of windows on the visual quality of indoor spaces (Vol. 53). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1976). The prediction of preference for familiar.pdf. SAGE Social Sciencs Collections, 8(4), 627–645.
Holmes-Smith, P. (2006). School Socio-Economic Density and its Effect on School Performance. Report for the New South Wales Department of Education and Training, (March), 1–39. Retrieved from http://www.scseec.edu.au/
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1999). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 213(November), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-538-8-3
Inan, T. (2013). An investigation on daylighting performance in educational institutions. Structural Survey, 31(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801311317536
Jamrozik, A., Clements, N., Hasan, S. S., Zhao, J., Zhang, R., Campanella, C., … Bauer, B. (2019). Access to daylight and view in an office improves cognitive performance and satisfaction and reduces eyestrain: A controlled crossover study. Building and Environment, 165(March), 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106379
Jiang, S. (2016). Encouraging engagement with therapeutic landscapes: Using transparent spaces to optimize stress reduction in urban health facilities. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 76(10-A(E)), 1–218. Retrieved from http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3705145%5Cnhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc12&NEWS=N&AN=2016-16229-063
Kaplan, R. (1993a). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1–4), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7
Kaplan, R. (1993b). The Role of Nature in the Urban Context. Behavior and the Natural Environment, 26, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_5
Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective.
Konstantzos, I, & Tzempelikos, A. (2015). Design Recommendations for Perimeter Office, 271–276.
Konstantzos, Iason, Chan, Y. C., Seibold, J. C., Tzempelikos, A., Proctor, R. W., & Protzman, J. B. (2015). View clarity index: A new metric to evaluate clarity of view through window shades. Building and Environment, 90, 206–214.
Koohsari, A. M., Fayaz, R., & Kari, B. M. (2015). The Influence of Window Dimensions and Location on Residential Building Energy Consumption by Integrating Thermal and Lighting Analysis in a Mild and Humid Climate. MAGNT Research Report, 3(4), 187–194. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/14.9831/1444-8939.2015/3-4/MAGNT.19
Koranteng, C, Essel, C., & Nkrumah, J. (2015). Passive Analysis of the Effect of Window Size and Position on Indoor Comfort for Residential Rooms in Kumasi, Ghana. Iarjset, 2(10), 114–115. https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2015.21024
Koranteng, Christian, Nkrumah, J., & Essel, C. (2016). An Experimental Assessment of the Efficiency of Glazing Types Used As Cladding Materials for Multi-Storey Office Buildings in Ghana, 2(1), 1–9.
Kwon, M., Remøy, H., & van den Bogaard, M. (2019). Influential design factors on occupant satisfaction with indoor environment in workplaces. Building and Environment, 157(May), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.002
Leather, P., Pyrgas, M., Beale, D., & Lawrence, C. (1998). Windows in the Work Place,Sunlight,View, and Occupational Stress. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 739–762.
Leder, S., Newsham, G. R., Veitch, J. A., Mancini, S., & Charles, K. E. (2016). Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: A new analysis. Building Research and Information, 44(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.1003176
Leslie, R. P. (2003). Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: Why and how? Building and Environment, 38(2), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00118-X
Lindberg, C. M., Srinivasan, K., Gilligan, B., Razjouyan, J., Lee, H., Najafi, B., … Sternberg, E. M. (2018). Effects of office workstation type on physical activity and stress. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 75(10), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105077
Lottrup, L., Stigsdotter, U. K., Meilby, H., Claudi, A. G., Lottrup, L., Stigsdotter, U. K., Claudi, A. G. (2015). The Workplace Window View : A Determinant of Office Workers ’ Work Ability and Job Satisfaction The Workplace Window View : Landscape Research, 40(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2013.829806
Madu, N. G., Asawo, P. S., & Gabriel, O. M. J. (2017). Physical Workplace Environment and Employees ’ Engagement: A Theoritical Exploration. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 01(10), 867–884.
Matusiak, B. S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2016). How we evaluate the view out through the window. Architectural Science Review, 59(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2015.1032879
Morrison, R. L., & Macky, K. A. (2017). The demands and resources arising from shared office spaces. Applied Ergonomics, 60, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.007
Ne’eman, E., Sweitzer, G., & Vine, E. (1984). Office worker response to lighting and daylighting issues in workspace environments: A pilot survey. Energy and Buildings, 6(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(84)90071-9
Ozdemir, A. (2010). The effect of window views’ openness and naturalness on the perception of rooms’ spaciousness and brightness: A visual preference study. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(16), 2275–2287. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/SRE/article-abstract/C49A20017716
Pallant, J. (2016). For the SPSS Survival Manual Astep by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Open University Press.
Parry, S. (n.d.). Fit Indices commonly reported for CFA and SEM. Retrieved from https://www.nzz.ch/panorama/die-wichtigsten-grafiken-zum-coronavirus-ld.1542774
Qureshi, S. M., & Kang, C. W. (2015). Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.006
Salonen, H., Lahtinen, M., Lappalainen, S., Knibbs, L. D., Morawaska, L., & Reijula, K. (2014). The impact of windows , daylight and views of nature on health and wellbeing in healthcare facilities. The International Sustainable Built Environment Conference, (January), 28–30.
Samani, S. A. (2015). The Impact of Personal Control over Office Workspace on Environmental Satisfaction and Performance. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 163–172. Retrieved from http://www.aiscience.org/journal/jssh
Sant’Anna, D. O., Dos Santos, P. H., Vianna, N. S., & Romero, M. A. (2018). Indoor environmental quality perception and users’ satisfaction of conventional and green buildings in Brazil. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43(August), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.027
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes. The Biophilia Hypothesis, (November), 73–137. https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:7372161
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
Van Der Valk, S., Myers, T., Atkinson, I., & Mohring, K. (2015). Sensor networks in workplaces: Correlating comfort and productivity. 2015 IEEE 10th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, ISSNIP 2015, (April), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSNIP.2015.7106905
Verderber, S., Grice, S., & Gutentag, P. (1987). Wellness health care and the architectural environment. Journal of Community Health, 12(2–3), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323478
Yildirim, K., Akalin-baskaya, A., & Celebi, M. (2007). The effects of window proximity, partition height, and gender on perceptions of open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.004
Zubairu, S. N., & Olagunju, R. E. (2003). A Study of Space Planning in Private and Government Office Buildings in Abuja and Minna, 5f84abacf9213fea9499da4f536d2260b271.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).