Tragedy of the Anticommons (ToA) in Agricultural Land Partition involving Fragmented Co-proprietorships: An Analysis of Malaysian Case Laws
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n2.921Keywords:
Tragedy of the Anticommons (ToA), Agricultural Land Partition, Case Laws, Malaysia, Transaction Costs, UnderinvestmentAbstract
There is a lack of understanding of the theory of the Tragedy of the Anticommons (ToA), a type of coordination breakdown or a hold-out problem involving multiple fragmented co-proprietorships with undivided shares, in the land partition context. This paper, hence, discusses how ToA occurs particularly in the agricultural land partition that is primarily governed under the National Land Code 1965 and proposes potential legal and non-legal approaches and mechanisms to address the land tragedy. An abductive content analysis of (9) case laws extracted from the LexisNexis database was performed through which themes and codes were developed to explain how ToA hindering land partition takes place. Subsequently, judicial decisions in solving disputes arising from land partition and existing best practices in dealing with the tragedy were reviewed. The case laws review indicated that unsuccessful agricultural land partition associated with high transaction costs in securing co-proprietors consensus is a form of simultaneous ToA, that most of the unpartitioned land (anticommons) may be subject to underinvestment (land mismanagement) and disuse. Key factors leading to disagreement among co-proprietors and consequently ToA are as follows: (i) unequal (unfair) proportion or shares of land; (ii) uneven geographical partition and spatial distribution of government reserves; and (iii) potential damages and negative effects (e.g., loss of income and property). To address ToA, these are legal mechanisms proposed: statutory enforcement of the National Land Code (NLC) 1965 (via land forfeiture and reversion), the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) 1960 on compulsory land acquisition, and judicial decisions (e.g., land partitions may take place if it is fairly distributed and made by the majority shareholders), while non-legal approaches cover negotiation and arbitration; en-bloc sales (partition); collective action through enhanced social capital; and imposition of a tax on underutilised land. By showcasing various agricultural anticommons tragedies and their potential negative externalities in the land partition context, this paper offers policy and management insights that help land officers and local authorities ensure the maximum efficiency and productivity (i.e., highest and best use) of the land
References
Filipe, J., Ferreira, M. A. M., & Coelho, M. (2011). An ethical issue in anti-commons management. Aquaculture case in Portugal. International Journal of Academic Research, (1): 243-245.
Bird, R. M., & Slack, E. (2002, March). Land and property taxation: a review. In Workshop on Land Issues in Latin American and the Caribbean. May 19: 1-61
Bretsen SN, Hill PJ (2009) Water markets as a tragedy of the anticommons. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 33(3):723–783.
Christudason, A. (2009). Property rights: Achieving a fine balance in collective sales of strata developments in Singapore. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(1): 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561450910950232
Christudason, A. (2012). Urban rejuvenation through collective (en bloc) sales in Singapore: Property rights or property wrongs? Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 5(1): 51–64.
Demetriou, D. (2014). The Development of an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consollidation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02347-2
Food and Agricultural Organisations (FAO). Saint Lucia Natural Resources and Agricultural Development Project, (1986). http://www.oas.org/usde/publications/Unit/oea36e/ch10.htm
The National Land Code (Act 56 of 1965) & Regulations, (2020).
Grewe, N. R. (2003). Social capital and local development: an exploration of three forms of community-based social capital [Iowa State University]. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/1433
Halimatussadiah, A. (2013). Social Capital to Strengthen Environmental Collective Action In Indonesia. In HDCA (Human Development and Capability Association), 1–17. https://hd-ca.org/?s2member_file_download_key=147c1b6e2e1a0f92bba846eecf6df6a0&s2member_file_download=/Halimatussadiah-How_social_capital_can_strengthen_community_action-199_b.pdf
Heller, M. (2013). The tragedy of the anticommons: A concise introduction and lexicon. The modern law review, 76(1): 6-25.
Khalid, H., & Dayyan, M. (2012, July). Resource management: Fragmentation of land ownership and its impact on sustainability of agriculture. In UMT 11th International Annual Symposium on Sustainability Science and Management 9-11
Koh Boh Huat & Ors V Tan Niam Neo & Anor [2007] 1 MLJ 328
Kremer, A. M., Cavalheiro, R. T., & Vilpoux, O. F. (2019). Relevant factors for collective action in the common-pool resources context. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 13(4): 52. https://doi.org/10.12712/RPCA.V13I4.38389
Ku Yan Bte Ku Abdullah V Ku Idris Bin Ku Ahmad & Ors [1991] 3 MLJ 439
Ling, G. H. T., Ho, C. S., Tsau, K. Y., & Cheng, C. T. (2019a). Interrelationships between Public Open Space, Common Pool Resources, Publicness Levels and Commons Dilemmas: A Different Perspective in Urban Planning. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 6(2):13-21.
Ling, G. H. T., Leng, P. C., & Ho, C. S. (2019b). Effects of diverse property rights on rural neighbourhood public open space (POS) governance: Evidence from Sabah, Malaysia. Economies, 7(2): 61.
Lueck D, Miceli T (2007) Property law. In: Shavell S, Polinsky AM (eds) Handbook of law & economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
McCarter M.W., Kopelman S., Turk T. A., Ybarra C.E., (2012). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How the tragedy of the anticommons emerges in organizations. ESI Working Paper, 12-14. http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/75 Retrieved December 20, 2021
Moo Hon Yee V S Abdul Rahman Bin Pak Shaik Abdul Kader (2018) MLJU 1822
Naik Diew Kong V Ling Sing Hang & Co Sdn Hhd & Ors (2016) MLJU 1518
Ngu Leh Ngiik & Anor V Lee Yiu Ping & Ors (2019) 4 MLJ 681
Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 No 51, (2015). https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2015-051#sec.155
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2003). Social Science Perspective on Social Capital : Social Capital and Collective Action. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 65(1): 155–233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3541518%5Cnhttp://www.ejournal.unam.mx/rms/2003-1/RMS03105.pdf Date access: November 10, 2019
Parisi, F. ;, Schulz, N. ;, & Depoorter, B. (2000). Duality in property: Commons and anticommons. www.econstor.eu
Parisi, F., Schulz, N., & Depoorter, B. (2004). Simultaneous and sequential anticommons. European Journal of Law and Economics, 17(2), 175-190
Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and connectedness: Issues and implications for agriculture, rural development and natural resource management in ACP countries. Review paper for CTA. CTA working document number 8032.
S Subramaniam & Ors V Inderjit Kaur D/O Karnail Singh & Anor [1997] 3 Mlj 366
Sulong, J., & Taha, M. M. (2016). Implications of Multiple Land Ownership in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(5): 408–411. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2016.v6.681
Takamura, G., Nishide, T., Kanazawa, Y., & Hayashi, M. (2021). Bundle of Rights Reversed: Anticommons in a Japanese Common Property Forest Due to Legalization. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1): 259–275. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5334/ijc.1080.
Takahashi, T., Matsushita, K., & Nishimura, T. (2021). Community actions against anticommons of forests in contemporary Japan: Case studies of former common forests. Journal of Forest Research, 26(1): 68-74.
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological theory, 30(3): 167-186.
Tong Ah Kau @ Tong Fong Yam Dan Lain-Lain V Tong Faung Onn & Lain-Lain (2015) Mlju 1984
Wiesinger, G. (2007). The importance of social capital in rural development, networking and decision-making in rural areas. Http://Journals.Openedition.Org/Rga, 95–4: 43–56. https://doi.org/10.4000/RGA.354 Date access: November 10, 2019
Ying, QW. 2019. “Tragedy of the Anticommons.” In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, edited by A. Marciano and G. B. Ramello, 65 – 71. New York: Springer.
Ying Q, Zhang G (2008) Fragmentation of licensing right, bargaining and the tragedy of the anti-commons. European Journal of Law and Economics. 26(1):61–73.
Zuriati Binti Osman V Butterworth Lim Construction Sdn Bhd (2020) Mlju 467
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
