Next-Generation BIM Competency: Curriculum Integration to Equip UTM Civil Engineering Graduates for Industry Demands

Authors

  • Ng Hock Seng Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor.
  • Ng Chiew Teng Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor.
  • Suzila Mohd Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor.
  • Mohamad Shazwan Ahmad Shah Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor.
  • Ng Teck Wei Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Built Environment, Tunku Abdul Rahman University Management and Technology, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur.
  • Tie Mei Sin Jurutera Minsar Consult Sdn Bhd, Level 2 & 3, Westmoore House, Twin Tower Center, Rock Road, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v12.n3.1454

Keywords:

Building Information Modelling, conceptual framework, civil engineering curriculum, improvements, UTM

Abstract

Building Information Modelling has modernized the landscape of construction management and education by presenting innovative resources that enrich the teaching and application of industry-specific management practices. However, there remains a lack of standardised criteria for cultivating skilled BIM graduates and proving that current course information meets the construction industry's demands for fresh graduates. This study aims to integrate BIM into the civil engineering curriculum at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) to better equip undergraduates with the competencies required by the Malaysian construction industry. Using a mixed-method explanatory sequential design, the study focuses on quantitative data collection and analysis, then transitions to qualitative methods to validate the initial findings and provide further insights. Data was collected from 90 civil engineering students at UTM who had completed BIM courses, with a response rate of 48.65%. The findings indicate that the current curriculum does not fully prepare graduates with the essential BIM skills required in the workplace, as BIM adoption in Malaysia is largely confined to 3D applications. The study identifies key technical skills for BIM-proficient graduates, such as modelling, information management, project coordination and interoperability with BIM tools. While non-technical skills go to adaptability and flexibility, continuous learning, collaboration and visualisation. To enhance the curriculum, it is recommended to provide elective courses in BIM, continuous curriculum updates, soft skills developments and hands-on experience. A BIM conceptual framework for integration into the UTM curriculum is proposed based on data collected from surveys, expert consultations, and an extensive literature review. The study presents valuable insights into the current state of BIM education at UTM and can be a point of reference for future research on standardising BIM teaching protocols in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).

Author Biographies

Ng Chiew Teng, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor.

Senior Lecturer

Department of Structures and Materials

Faculty of Civil Engineering

Ng Teck Wei, Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Built Environment, Tunku Abdul Rahman University Management and Technology, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur.

Associate Dean

Department of Construction Management

Faculty of Built Environment

References

Ahankoob, A., Manley, K., & Abbasnejad, B. (2022). The role of contractors’ building information modelling (BIM) experience in realising the potential values of BIM. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(4): 588-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1639126

Al-Ashmori, Y. Y., Othman, I., & Al-Aidrous, A.-H. M. H. (2022). Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective. Sustainability, 14(6): 3192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063192

Alaloul, W. S., Qureshi, A. H., En, Y. P., Khan, S. A., Musarat, M. A., Alzubi, K. M., & Salaheen, M. A. (2023). Survey Evaluation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for Health and Safety in Building Construction Projects in Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(6): 4899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064899

Arroteia, A. V., Freitas, R. C., & Melhado, S. B. (2021). Barriers to BIM adoption in Brazil. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7: 520154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.520154

Aziz, N. M., & Zainon, N. (2023). Driving factors for lean-BIM implementation in Malaysia’s construction industry: qualitative interview-based study. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(4): 872-891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-01-2022-0019

Azman, N. S., Ramli, M. Z., Razman, R., Zawawi, M. H., Ismail, I. N., & Isa, M. R. (2019). Relative importance index (RII) in ranking of quality factors on industrialised building system (IBS) projects in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2129, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118037

Belayutham, S., Zabidin, N. S., & Che Ibrahim, C. K. I. (2018). Dynamic representation of barriers for adopting building information modelling in Malaysian tertiary education. Construction Economics and Building, 18(4): 24-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v18i4.6228

Brahim, J., Yusoff, S. N. S., & Mat Yusoff, Z. (2021). Incorporation of building information modelling (BIM) in Malaysian higher education institutions: a review. Built Environment Journal (BEJ), 18(1): 15-22.

Casasayas, O., Hosseini, M. R., Edwards, D., Shuchi, S., & Chowdhury, M. (2021). Integrating BIM in higher education programs: Barriers and remedial solutions in Australia. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 27(1): 05020010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000044

Chaokromthong, K., & Sintao, N. (2021). Sample size estimation using Yamane and Cochran and Krejcie and Morgan and green formulas and Cohen statistical power analysis by G* Power and comparisions. Apheit international journal, 10(2): 76-86.

CIDB. (2020). Construction 4.0 Strategic Plan (2021-2025). https://www.cream.my/construction-4-0-strategic-plan-2021-2025. Retrieved on 30 September 2024

CIDB. (2022). Malaysia Building Information Modelling (BIM) Report 2021.https://smart.cidb.gov.my/publication/malaysia-building-information-modelling-bim-report-2021-457 Retrieved on 30 September 2024

Dalloul, F., & Saoud, L. (2023). Proposing a framework for introducing the concept of engineering digitization to develop curricula: case study-Tishreen University, Faculty of Civil Engineering. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 6(1): 34-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.060103

Del Savio, A. A., Galantini Velarde, K., Díaz-Garay, B., & Valcárcel Pollard, E. (2022). A Methodology for Embedding Building Information Modelling (BIM) in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Program. Applied Sciences, 12(23): 12203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312203

Guo, B. H. W., Gonzalez, V. A., Puolitaival, T., Enegbuma, W., & Zou, Y. (2023). Bridging the gap between building information modelling education and practice: a competency-based education perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15): 2558-2569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2077546

Hadavi, A., & Alizadehsalehi, S. (2024). From BIM to metaverse for AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 160: 105248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105248

Jiang, Z. (2021). Research on the development of BIM technology based on the application in the field of civil engineering. E3S Web of Conferences, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126103025

Jin, R., Zou, P. X., Li, B., Piroozfar, P., & Painting, N. (2019). Comparisons of students’ perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(9): 1899-1923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2018-0275

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4): 625-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Le, N., Er, M., & Sankaran, S. (2018). Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption and Implementation: Interaction Between BIM Users and Non-BIM Users. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.res.2018.75

lot Tanko, B., & Mbugua, L. (2022). BIM education in higher learning institutions: a scientometric review and the Malaysia perspective. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(1): 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n1.864

Mehranfar, M., Vega-Torres, M. A., Braun, A., & Borrmann, A. (2024). Automated data-driven method for creating digital building models from dense point clouds and images through semantic segmentation and parametric model fitting. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 62: 102643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102643

Musarat, M. A., Alaloul, W. S., Cher, L. S., Qureshi, A. H., Alawag, A. M., & Baarimah, A. O. (2023). Applications of Building Information Modelling in the Operation and Maintenance Phase of Construction Projects: A Framework for the Malaysian Construction Industry. Sustainability, 15(6): 5044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065044

Ng, H. T., & Aryani, A. L. (2022). Identification of Skills among BIM Coordinators in the Malaysian Construction Industry. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 9(1): 20-26. https://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/jtmb/article/view/11846

Onungwa, I., Olugu-Uduma, N., & Shelden, D. R. (2021). Cloud BIM Technology as a Means of Collaboration and Project Integration in Smart Cities. Sage Open, 11(3): 21582440211033250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211033250

Raja Mohd Noor, R. N. H., Che Ibrahim, C. K. I., & Belayutham, S. (2023). The nexus of key attributes influencing the social collaboration among BIM actors: a review of construction literature. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(6): 988-998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1946902

Sampaio, A. Z. (2022). Introducing BIM in Curricular Programs of Civil Engineering. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(1): 31-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n1p31

Seng, N. H., Teng, N. C., Noor, N. M., Umar, S., Wei, N. T., Boon, K. H., & Ling, F. T. C. (2025). BIM Implementation in Malaysian Quantity Surveying: A Conceptual Framework for Success Aligned with the Strategic Plan 2021-2025. Diyala Journal of Engineering Sciences, 55-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2025.18103

Silva, T. F., Arroteia, A. V., Vieira, D. R., Melhado, S. B., & Carvalho, M. M. (2021). Exploring the influence of risks in BIM implementation: A review exploring BIM critical success factors and BIM implementation phases. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 8(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02511

Syafika, N., Rahim, A., Ismail, S., Aminah, & Taylor, G. (2022). Implementation Strategies of Building Information Modelling towards Sustainable Residential Construction Project in Malaysia. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10: 1556-1563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.100425

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6): 1273-1296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Taherdoost, H. (2019). What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. Hamed Taherdoost, 1-10.

Tsai, M.-H., Chen, K.-L., & Chang, Y.-L. (2019). Development of a Project-Based Online Course for BIM Learning. Sustainability, 11(20): 5772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205772

UKM. (2022). Civil Engineering Programme 2022/2023. https://www.ukm.my/jurutera/en/undergraduate-handbook-for-academic-session-2022-2023/ Retrieved on 30 September 2024

UM. (2023). Program Handbook Session 2023/2024. https://engine.um.edu.my/bachelor-of-civil-engineering. Retrieved on 30 September 2024

UPM. (2021). Undergraduate Study Programme Hand Book Session 2021/2022. https://eng.upm.edu.my/akademik/akademik_prasiswazah/skema_pengajian-3464?L=en Retrieved on 30 September 2024

UTM. (2022). Academic Guidelines Faculty of Civil Engineering Session 2022/2023. https://civil.utm.my/undergraduate/academic-guidelines/ Retrieved on 25 August 2025

Viana, V. L. B., & Carvalho, M. T. M. (2021). Prioritization of risks related to BIM implementation in brazilian public agencies using fuzzy logic. Journal of Building Engineering, 36: 102104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102104

Wang, L., Huang, M., Zhang, X., Yan, X., Jin, R., Wanatowski, D., Cheshmehzangi, A., & Chohan, N. (2023). Incorporating BIM into the upper-division curriculum of construction engineering and management. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(3): 482-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2112150

Wang, L. Y., Huang, M. P., Zhang, X. H., Jin, R. Y., & Yang, T. (2020). Review of BIM Adoption in the Higher Education of AEC Disciplines. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 146(3): 06020001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.2643-9115.0000018

Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7: 100206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206

Yusuf, B. Y., Embi, M. R., & Ali, K. N. (2017). Academic readiness for building information modelling (BIM) integration to Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Malaysia. 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Hock Seng, N., Chiew Teng, N., Mohd, S., Ahmad Shah , M. S., Teck Wei, N., & Mei Sin, T. (2025). Next-Generation BIM Competency: Curriculum Integration to Equip UTM Civil Engineering Graduates for Industry Demands. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 12(3), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v12.n3.1454