Evaluation and Improvement of Thermal Comfort and Indoor Air Quality in Post-Disaster Permanent Housing: A Case Study of Bingöl, Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v13.n1.1466Keywords:
Department of Architecture, Bingöl University, Selahaddin-i Eyyubi, Üniversite Caddesi No:1, 12000 Merkez/Bingöl, Türkiye.Abstract
Post-disaster permanent housing plays a critical role in long-term recovery. In cold-climate regions like Bingöl, Türkiye, such housing must ensure adequate thermal comfort and indoor air quality (IAQ) to support occupant well-being. This study evaluates the environmental performance of a representative single-storey post-earthquake housing unit constructed after the 2003 Bingöl earthquake. Field measurements were conducted between December 2023 and February 2024 in five rooms, recording temperature, relative humidity, air velocity, CO² concentrations and PM (PM₁–₁₀) levels. Results revealed that most rooms failed to meet ASHRAE 55 winter comfort thresholds, with temperature deviations exceeding 3.5°C in under-heated spaces. Stoves improved thermal comfort but elevated CO₂ and PM concentrations, indicating trade-offs between comfort and IAQ. Dynamic simulations using DesignBuilder tested envelope retrofit scenarios including insulation and glazing upgrades. Simulations showed a 7.1% reduction in discomfort hours, 60% lower heating energy demand, and a 12.3% drop in CO₂ emissions. These improvements were cost-effective and readily applicable in post-disaster contexts. This study contributes by combining field-based environmental data with simulation modelling to assess both thermal comfort and IAQ in cold-climate post-disaster housing. The findings inform resilient and sustainable housing strategies for future disaster recovery efforts.
References
AFAD. (2018) All Earthquakes in Turkey, Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, https://www.afad.gov.tr/, Accessed date: 17 September 2018.
Ahmed JA, Yusoff WFM and Mohamed MF. (2025) Validation Field-Measured Data Through Design-Builder Simulation Software of Indoor Air Temperature in a Modern Residential Building in Erbil, Iraq. Instrumentation Mesure Métrologie 24(2): 131–141.
Aguilar-Perez Y, Rodrigues L, Beccarelli P, et al. (2023) Post-Occupancy Evaluation in Post-Disaster Social Housing in a Hot-Humid Climate Zone in Mexico. Sustainability 15: 13443.
Albadra D, Coley D and Hart J. (2018) Toward healthy housing for the displaced. The Journal of Architecture 23: 115-136.
ASHRAE-Handbook. (1989) Physiological Principles: Comfort and Health.
ASHRAE-Standart-55. (2013) ASHRAE Standard 55 - Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy(ANSI Approved), Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE).
ASHRAE (2020) ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2020: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
Boelhouwer, P., & van der Heijden, H. (2018). The effect of earthquakes on the housing market and the quality of life in the province of Groningen, the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1-10.
Bernardi N and Kowaltowski DC. (2006) Environmental comfort in school buildings: A case study of awareness and participation of users. Environment and behavior 38: 155-172.
Calis G and Kuru M. (2017) Statistical significance of gender and age on thermal comfort: a case study in Turkey. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability. 40-51. Thomas Telford Ltd
Chen X, Yang H and Sun K. (2016) A holistic passive design approach to optimize indoor environmental quality of a typical residential building in Hong Kong. Energy 113: 267-281.
Crawley DB, Lawrie LK, Winkelmann FC, et al. (2001) EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings 33: 319-331.
Çulun P, Varolgüneş FK, Özer G, et al. (2022) Thermal Comfort Comparison of Different Dwelling Typologies. İdealkent 13: 2677-2701.
Davidson, C. H., Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., Dikmen, N., & Sliwinski, A. (2007). Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat international, 31(1): 100-115.
Dikmen, N., & Elias-Ozkan, S. T. (2016). Housing after disaster: a post occupancy evaluation of a reconstruction project. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 167-178.
D'Orazio M and Maracchini G. (2019) An experimental investigation on the indoor hygrothermal environment of a reinforced-EPS based temporary housing solution. Energy and Buildings 204: 109500.
De Dear R and Brager GS. (1998) Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference.
Doğangün A. (2004) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey. Engineering Structures 26: 841-856.
Emir S. (2016) The evaluation of thermal comfort on primary schools in hot-humid climates: a case study for Antalya. European Journal of Sustainable Development 5: 53-53.
Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA). (2025). Activity-Based Consumer Tariffs. Ankara, Türkiye. Retrieved on October 7, 2025 from https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-1327/elektrik-faturalarina-esas-tarife-tablolari
Esiyok U. (2006) Energy consumption and thermal performance of typical residential buildings in Turkey. Dortmund, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2007.
Fanger PO. (1970) Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering.
Garg V, Mathur J and Bhatia A. (2020) Building energy simulation: A workbook using designbuilder™: CRC Press.
Gür M and Sezer FŞ.(2018) Indoor Comfort Condıtıons in Terms of User Satısfactıon For Mıddle-Income Groups: The Case of Ataevler, Bursa, Turkey.
Halıcı F. (2019) Kalorifer ve Havalandırma Tesisatı (Isı Yalıtımı ve Örnek Proje). Birsen Yayınevi.
Hamilton, N. (2012). Post-disaster shelter: A studio-based response to emergency shelter in natural disaster zones. Sustainable futures: Architecture and urbanism in the global south, Kampala, Uganda, 2730.
Hou C, Hu W, Jiang Y and Gao W. (2024) Optimization and renovation design of indoor thermal environment in traditional houses in Northeast Sichuan (China)—A case study of a three-section courtyard house. Sustainability 16(7): 2921.
ISO-7730. (2005). Ergonomics of the thermal environment–assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland.
Johnson, C. (2007). Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat international, 31(1): 36-52.
Kaihoul A, Pitzalis E, Sriti L, Di Turi S, Amraoui K. (2024) Enhancing thermal comfort assessment: A sensitivity study of PMV-PPD and adaptive models in an Algerian reference hotel across different climate zones. Indoor and Built Environment. 33(9): 1680-1704. DOI:10.1177/1420326X241266762
Kaplan H, Yilmaz S, Binici H, et al. (2004) May 1, 2003 Turkey—Bingöl earthquake: damage in reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Failure Analysis 11: 279-291.
Khovalyg D, Kazanci OB, Halvorsen H, et al. (2020) Critical review of standards for indoor thermal environment and air quality. Energy and Buildings 213: 109819.
Kuru M and Calis G. (2017) Understanding the relationship between indoor environmental parameters and thermal sensation of users via statistical analysis. Procedia Engineering 196: 808-815.
Kürüm Varolgüneş, F. (2021). Post-disaster permanent housing: the case of the 2003 Bingöl earthquake in Turkey. Disaster Prevention and Management, 30(2): 77-93.
Liu Y, Li T, Xu W, et al. (2023) Building information modelling-enabled multi-objective optimization for energy consumption parametric analysis in green buildings design using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Energy and Buildings 300: 113665.
Malik J, Bardhan R and Banerji P. (2021) Understanding the Effect of Occupant Behaviour on Thermal Comfort and Energy Use in Slum Rehabilitation Housing. Urban Science and Engineering: Proceedings of ICUSE 2020. Springer, 287-295.
Malik J, Bardhan R, Hong T, et al. (2020) Contextualising adaptive comfort behaviour within low-income housing of Mumbai, India. Building and Environment 177: 106877.
Mihara K, Cheung T, Ono E, Arisaka S and Hasama T. (2025) Longitudinal analysis of thermal responses: A comparative study of home and office environments in Singapore and Japan. Building and Environment 280: 113108.
Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change (MEUCC), (2025). Unit prices (EPS, glass wool, PUR, and window replacement rates). Ankara, Türkiye.
Mousavi S, Gheibi M, Wacławek S, et al. (2023) Low-energy residential building optimisation for energy and comfort enhancement in semi-arid climate conditions. Energy Conversion and Management 291: 117264.
Nagano K and Mochida T. (2004) Experiments on thermal environmental design of ceiling radiant cooling for supine human subjects. Building and Environment 39: 267-275.
Nocera F, Castagneto F and Gagliano A. (2020) Passive house as temporary housing after disasters. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ) 18: 42-47.
NIST (2022). Handbook 135: Life-Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program.
Özbey MF and Turhan C. (2022) A comprehensive comparison and accuracy of different methods to obtain mean radiant temperature in indoor environment. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 31: 101295.
Özdamar M and Umaroğulları F. (2017) Bir Ofis Yapısı Örneğinde Isıl Konfor ve İç Hava Kalitesinin İncelenmesi. Megaron 12.
Peacock, W. G., Dash, N., Zhang, Y., & Van Zandt, S. (2017). Post-disaster sheltering, temporary housing and permanent housing recovery. In Handbook of Disaster Research. 569-594. Springer.
Shaman J, Pitzer VE, Viboud C, et al. (2010) Absolute humidity and the seasonal onset of influenza in the continental United States. Plos Biology 8: e1000316.
Shrestha B, Uprety S, Pokharel JR, et al. (2023) Study on the Winter Thermal Environment and Thermal Satisfaction of the Post-Disaster Prototype and Vernacular Houses in Nepal. Buildings 13: 2430.
Turhan C and Gokcen-Akkurt G. (2018) Assessment of thermal comfort preferences in Mediterranean climate: A university office building case. Thermal Science 22: 2177-2187.
Wang Z. (2006) A field study of the thermal comfort in residential buildings in Harbin. Building and Environment 41: 1034-1039.
Wong LT, Mui KW and Hui P. (2008) A multivariate-logistic model for acceptance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in offices. Building and Environment 43: 1-6.
Varolgüneş, S. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: trends, gaps, and policy implications. Natural Hazards, 1-25.
Yaman GÖ. (2023) The effect of building facades window/wall ratio and window properties on energy performance. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 38: 851-863.
Yaman GÖ, Varolgüneş FK and Çulun P. (2021) Investigation of thermal comfort in university offices: The case of the Bingöl University. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9 (7): 2441-2451.
Yilmaz Z. (2006) Akilli binalar ve yenilenebilir enerji. Tesisat Muhendisligi Dergisi,(91): 7-15.
Zhai P, Li J, Lei T, Zhu J and Novakovic V. (2025) Indoor thermal comfort comparison between passive solar house with active solar heating and without active solar heating in Tibetan. Energy and Built Environment 6(2): 285–296.
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. (2024).Geographical Situation of Bingöl Province.
Retrieved on18 April 2024 from https://bingol.csb.gov.tr/cografi-durumu-i-1393
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles that appear in International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- This Journal applies Creative Commons Licenses of CC-BY-NC-SA
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
